Skip to main content

Knowledge is power? Think again.

In the most recent issue of the Review, Kathryne M. Young and Katie R. Billings reported on their study of people’s willingness to assert rights in a variety of encounters with police, including interrogations, home searches, and car searches.  They found that not only is knowledge of constitutional rights unrelated to rights assertion,[1] but patterns of police-citizen interactions are related to social class.  People from modest backgrounds were likely to approach police stops with more willingness to help the police and more skepticism that police would heed their rights assertions.  People from upper-middle-class backgrounds, on the other hand, brought a greater sense of entitlement and self-directedness to these interactions, making them more likely to assert their rights. Their findings contravene the U.S. Supreme Court’s long-held assumption that informing people about a constitutional right means they will be empowered to assert that right.  Not so —hidden social processes actually render people with lower socioeconomic status more vulnerable to arrest and prosecution than their well-off counterparts. 

The authors root their work in studies of legal consciousness—how people experience, think about, and use the law.  They demonstrate that using cultural capital as a lens to understand how legal consciousness works reveals social processes through which the law produces, perpetuates, and reifies inequality.  Just as social class and cultural capital shape people’s interactions with education[2] and medicine,[3] they shape people’s interactions with law, which has important implications for access to civil and criminal justice.

[1] Young, Kathryne M. and Christin L. Munsch. 2014. “Fact and Fiction in Constitutional Criminal Procedure.” South Carolina Law Review 66: 445–90.
[2] Calarco, Jessica McCrory, 2018, Negotiating Opportunities: How the Middle Class Secures Advantages in School. New York: Oxford University Press; Jack, Anthony Abraham, 2016, “(No) Harm in Asking: Class, Acquired Cultural Capital, and Academic Engagement at an Elite University,” 89 Sociology of Education 1–19.
[3] Lareau, Annette, 2011, Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press; Dubbin, Leslie A., Jamie Suki Chang, and Janet K. Shim, 2013, “Cultural Health Capital and the Interactional Dynamics of Patient-Centered Care,” 93 Social Science & Medicine 113­–20.

Popular posts from this blog

How do text messages complicate contemporary sexual assault adjudication?

By Heather Hlavka and Sameena Mulla 
Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Marquette University

“There’s no video, no injury. It’s purely one hundred percent ‘he said, she said.’ They had a terrible relationship. They were nasty to each other and they don’t get along well, probably never will. But there is no evidence to support the state’s case, other than their words.” Our article, “’That’s How She Talks’: Animating Text Message Evidence in the Sexual Assault Trial,” begins with these familiar words offered by a defense attorney during a sexual assault trial in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The oft-invoked trope of “he said, she said” in cases of sexual violence suggests that without third-party eye witness testimony or material evidence, sexual assault allegations rest on conflicting reports provided by victims, the accused, and other witnesses. But how do trial attorneys reinvent this trope when the words of the witnesses are preserved as text messages?

Text messages are recorded co…

What Courts do with Executive Privilege Claims

By Gbemende Johnson, Hamilton College

“Because Congress requires this material in order to perform our constitutionally-mandated responsibilities, I will issue a subpoena for the full report and the underlying materials.” This was the response of House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) after receiving the redacted 448-page Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.The battle over the Mueller Report is just one example of conflicts between Congress and the executive branch over executive privilege, where agency officials claim they can withhold documents. Many disputes land in federal court. The Obama Administration Department of Justice spent years in court defending its claim of executive privilege over documents related to the ATF’s “Fast and Furious” gunwalking operation. Federal courts have proven less likely to let cabinet level agencies like the Department of Justice withhold documents than they are with independent agencies li…

Switching Up the Metaphor: from Baseball to Knitting

Susan M. Sterett, University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Metaphors guide what we see. In studying law and courts, metaphors for the law have come from baseball: Justice Roberts famously said in his confirmation hearing that judges call balls and strikes. Justice Kavanaugh followed his lead. Although umpires argued the analogy misunderstands the creativity the job requires, it remains a common metaphor for judging. The valuable website Oyez asks on each Supreme Court justice’s biography which baseball player is most like the justice’s contribution to the law. It’s an incomprehensible question for those who don’t follow men’s professional baseball closely. It also points to justices, and individual achievement, as the key players in law. Others are spectators.

What would show up if instead an activity often dismissed as trivial, mechanistic and feminine—knitting (and I want to include crochet; for brevity I’ll sum up both with knitting)—were the metaphor for the law instead?