Skip to main content
Just out in Law & Society Review.  On the heels of the warmest January on record, a new paper on indigenous groups' human rights claims in the face of climate change...



Is protection from climate change a human right? In 2005, Inuk activist Sheila Watt-Cloutier, on behalf Inuit based in the Canadian arctic and Alaska and with the support of two American environmental NGOs, submitted a petition against the United States before the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights alleging that the United States was responsible for how climate change had undermined their human rights, culture, property, traditional land, health, life, integrity, and security, subsistence, and housing – an argument that could referred to as asserting the right to be cold.

The petition supported an influential transnational effort to build linkages between human rights and climate change. Over time, this advocacy has resulted in the integration of human rights language in multilateral climate negotiations, the adoption of decisions on climate change in the United Nations human rights system, and the initiation of rights-based climate litigation around the world. At the same time, the petition had little impact on policy-makers in the United States or Canada or among Inuit communities themselves. Despite its shortcoming as a vehicle for empowering Inuit communities, the petition may be seen as a form of Inuit storytelling, warning the world of the dangers of a rapidly changing climate. Tragically, it is a story that most governments have not yet accepted, with dire consequences for Inuit and the planet as a whole.


Authors:
Sébastien Jodoin is an Assistant Professor in the McGill Faculty of Law, where he holds the Canada Research Chair in Human Rights and the Environment and is a member of the Centre for Human Rights & Legal Pluralism.

Shannon Snow holds a BCL/LLB from McGill University and is a member of the southern Inuit community of NunatuKavut, in Labrador. Her research and professional interests involve organizational law and Indigenous legal revitalization.

Arielle Corobow holds a BCL/LLB from McGill University and is currently developing a diverse civil litigation practice in Montreal, with a particular interest in human rights, administrative, constitutional matters.

Popular posts from this blog

How do text messages complicate contemporary sexual assault adjudication?

By Heather Hlavka and Sameena Mulla 
Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Marquette University


“There’s no video, no injury. It’s purely one hundred percent ‘he said, she said.’ They had a terrible relationship. They were nasty to each other and they don’t get along well, probably never will. But there is no evidence to support the state’s case, other than their words.” Our article, “’That’s How She Talks’: Animating Text Message Evidence in the Sexual Assault Trial,” begins with these familiar words offered by a defense attorney during a sexual assault trial in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The oft-invoked trope of “he said, she said” in cases of sexual violence suggests that without third-party eye witness testimony or material evidence, sexual assault allegations rest on conflicting reports provided by victims, the accused, and other witnesses. But how do trial attorneys reinvent this trope when the words of the witnesses are preserved as text messages?

Text messages are recorded co…

Submit Your Papers to Law & Society Review!

Rebecca L. Sandefur

 The Law and Society Association and the whole field of law and society research owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Jeannine Bell, Susan Sterett, and Margot Young, for their work as Editors of Law & Society Review.As incoming Editor, I am grateful to them for their stewardship of the journal, their generous support of authors and aspiring authors, and their innovations to the Review, including this blog.
The incoming Editorial Board has begun receiving new manuscripts as they are submitted. Jon Gould, Robert Lawless, Elizabeth Mertz, Jennifer Robbennolt and Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve have generously agreed to serve in this role. Together with participation from the Editorial Advisory Board -- a group deeply appreciated and too numerous to list here -- these scholars’ contributions expand the expertise of the journal’s editorial office across disciplines, methods, theoretical traditions, and regions of the world. Danielle McClellan continues to steady the ship …

What Courts do with Executive Privilege Claims

By Gbemende Johnson, Hamilton College

“Because Congress requires this material in order to perform our constitutionally-mandated responsibilities, I will issue a subpoena for the full report and the underlying materials.” This was the response of House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) after receiving the redacted 448-page Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.The battle over the Mueller Report is just one example of conflicts between Congress and the executive branch over executive privilege, where agency officials claim they can withhold documents. Many disputes land in federal court. The Obama Administration Department of Justice spent years in court defending its claim of executive privilege over documents related to the ATF’s “Fast and Furious” gunwalking operation. Federal courts have proven less likely to let cabinet level agencies like the Department of Justice withhold documents than they are with independent agencies li…