Skip to main content

Switching Up the Metaphor: from Baseball to Knitting

Susan M. Sterett, University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Metaphors guide what we see. In studying law and courts, metaphors for the law have come from baseball: Justice Roberts famously said in his confirmation hearing that judges call balls and strikes. Justice Kavanaugh followed his lead. Although umpires argued the analogy misunderstands the creativity the job requires, it remains a common metaphor for judging. The valuable website Oyez asks on each Supreme Court justice’s biography which baseball player is most like the justice’s contribution to the law. It’s an incomprehensible question for those who don’t follow men’s professional baseball closely. It also points to justices, and individual achievement, as the key players in law. Others are spectators.

What would show up if instead an activity often dismissed as trivial, mechanistic and feminine—knitting (and I want to include crochet; for brevity I’ll sum up both with knitting)—were the metaphor for the law instead? 

Baseball is largely a United States game, with apologies to those in Japan, Latin America and Canada who love it. People knit around the world. Voting on the United States Supreme Court, and studying it as a matter of individual votes, is a United States practice. Studies of courts outside the United States focus less often on individual judicial votes, instead examining the complex processes of mobilizing rights claims, bringing cases in supranational courts, and implementing decisions. Judicialization is significant in global politics; knitting is a more inclusive, less US-centric metaphor than baseball. 

So, knitting as a metaphor leads to an understanding of the legal process that includes multiple participants. It’s more akin to sociolegal approaches to law, which lead to studying who mobilizes the law, how subjects of the law experience its development over time, and how organizations implement the law, than it is to approaches centering on elite judges. It also draws on something other than cognition, contributing to the rapidly increasing recognition of the importance of emotion to law.

Which other participants? 

People knit for refugees, a category governed in international law. Refugees are resettled via distinctive national legal processes. Women knit in refugee camps. Yarn shops and charities coordinate knitted donations for elementary schools and for preemies in hospitals. University of Cape Town’s Centre for Law and Society knits and crochets comfort creatures to go in kits for rape survivors, to be carried in pockets as people walk through the legal process (photo above). The law constitutes all these organizations. Knitting projects in prison are widespread; with mass incarceration, far too many people have an opportunity to learn to knit in conditions that law creates. Knitting’s a physical pleasure: colors are pretty, many yarns are soft to the touch, and people can quickly make something appealing and useful, with a low barrier to learning. Prison is not known for its safe pleasures. Like college-in-prison projects, teaching knitting to incarcerated or homeless people builds connections between the outside world and the abject subjects caught in the law. Knitting is meditative. It can help manage addiction and stress, and teach patience. Managing stress, developing patience and learning how to make mistakes are skills useful to anyone, including lawyers. Knitting lawyers even have a Facebook page.

Where else does the metaphor lead? Strands become fabrics. Knitting is a series of slip knots, flexible and sturdy, and readily undone when people pull on threads. That’s a different image of how appellate judging brings together cases to make a well-crafted or poorly made fabric than Bruno Latour’s description of the edifice the French Conseil d’Etat contributes to with each decision. Some knitting designers are celebrities, others contribute to variations in patterns, and others knit to rule. An online community of knitters—ravelry—encourages people to share photos of their projects and notes, and to develop their design skills. Encouragement on ravelry and in real life can lead women to becoming entrepreneurs. Designers who sell well have different, distinctive styles—Andrea Mowry is especially recognized for using multiple strands that fade into each other across a fabric. Stephen West designs very showy shapes often using a stunning amount of yarn for any one project, with multiple colors and textures. Wondering about race, celebrity and knitting? There’s a dissertation and a hash tag for that. For anyone who likes to celebrate individual judges, it’s not hard to start wondering what a multiple choice quiz would look like matching designers and judges, and what stories to tell about exclusion and qualifications. 

The fabric of law, including judicial decisions, cumulates stitch by stitch and row by row. In reproductive rights, knitting rather than baseball, individual balls and strikes, and individual judges, best describes developments in the United States. Cumulative decisions that count increasing restrictions on providers and access as not an ‘undue burden,’ per Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), create a fabric that leads people to describe the already extremely limited access to support for decisions about childbearing and rearing as hanging by a thread. 

Thirty years ago Patricia Williams explained that her mother told her lawyering was in her blood because a white ancestor was a lawyer; the statement included both racism and the promise of power. Perhaps working with law is women’s birthright because knitting is.

Popular posts from this blog

How do text messages complicate contemporary sexual assault adjudication?

By Heather Hlavka and Sameena Mulla 
Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Marquette University

“There’s no video, no injury. It’s purely one hundred percent ‘he said, she said.’ They had a terrible relationship. They were nasty to each other and they don’t get along well, probably never will. But there is no evidence to support the state’s case, other than their words.” Our article, “’That’s How She Talks’: Animating Text Message Evidence in the Sexual Assault Trial,” begins with these familiar words offered by a defense attorney during a sexual assault trial in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The oft-invoked trope of “he said, she said” in cases of sexual violence suggests that without third-party eye witness testimony or material evidence, sexual assault allegations rest on conflicting reports provided by victims, the accused, and other witnesses. But how do trial attorneys reinvent this trope when the words of the witnesses are preserved as text messages?

Text messages are recorded co…

Submit Your Papers to Law & Society Review!

Rebecca L. Sandefur

 The Law and Society Association and the whole field of law and society research owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Jeannine Bell, Susan Sterett, and Margot Young, for their work as Editors of Law & Society Review.As incoming Editor, I am grateful to them for their stewardship of the journal, their generous support of authors and aspiring authors, and their innovations to the Review, including this blog.
The incoming Editorial Board has begun receiving new manuscripts as they are submitted. Jon Gould, Robert Lawless, Elizabeth Mertz, Jennifer Robbennolt and Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve have generously agreed to serve in this role. Together with participation from the Editorial Advisory Board -- a group deeply appreciated and too numerous to list here -- these scholars’ contributions expand the expertise of the journal’s editorial office across disciplines, methods, theoretical traditions, and regions of the world. Danielle McClellan continues to steady the ship …

What Courts do with Executive Privilege Claims

By Gbemende Johnson, Hamilton College

“Because Congress requires this material in order to perform our constitutionally-mandated responsibilities, I will issue a subpoena for the full report and the underlying materials.” This was the response of House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) after receiving the redacted 448-page Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.The battle over the Mueller Report is just one example of conflicts between Congress and the executive branch over executive privilege, where agency officials claim they can withhold documents. Many disputes land in federal court. The Obama Administration Department of Justice spent years in court defending its claim of executive privilege over documents related to the ATF’s “Fast and Furious” gunwalking operation. Federal courts have proven less likely to let cabinet level agencies like the Department of Justice withhold documents than they are with independent agencies li…