Skip to main content

Lynchings and Contemporary Whites’ Perceptions of Blacks as Criminals


By Daniel P. Mears, Eric A. Stewart, Patricia Y. WarrenMiltonette O. Craig, and Ashley N. Arnio


For this study, we examined the idea that Whites who resided in areas where lynchings occurred would be more likely to view Blacks as criminals. We also wanted to investigate whether, more specifically, they would view Blacks as likely to commit crimes against Whites.

In so doing, we build on a growing body of scholarship that has examined the long-lasting effects of past lynchings on contemporary American society. Much of this work points to the notion that historical violence against Blacks has had repercussions that extend up to the present.

As we considered this idea, we took heed of research that has highlighted the salience of race in contemporary discussions about crime and punishment. Many studies have highlighted, for example, the dramatic increase in prisons nationally. Indeed, a large literature now has focused on understanding the causes and effects of what has come to be termed “mass incarceration.”

Race is central to accounts of mass incarceration or what some scholars term the “punitive turn” in corrections. Relative to their presence in the population, Blacks typically are overrepresented in arrest, conviction, probation, jail, prison, and parole statistics. Differences in offending may explain some of the disproportional representation of Blacks in the criminal justice system, but substantial concerns exist that they result in part from discrimination. Regardless of what drives the differences, however, public opinion research has drawn attention to the notion that Whites tend to equate race and criminality. From this perspective, to be Black is to be criminal, and to be a criminal is viewed as presumptively implying that the person is Black.

When we combined these two lines of work, it led us to hypothesize that one long-standing legacy of lynchings may be to shape contemporary Whites’ views not only about Blacks as criminals but also as a criminal threat to Whites. We also considered research that has underscored the ways that social and economic disadvantage and political conservatism have featured prominently in accounts of Whites’ views about crime and punishment. That led us to hypothesize that the “legacy” effect would be greater among Whites who lived in areas in America where socioeconomic disadvantage and political conservatism were greater.

Our analyses in fact support these hypotheses. For example, Whites from areas where lynchings occurred were more likely to view Blacks as criminal threats and to view Blacks as more likely to commit crimes against Whites. In addition, these effects were more pronounced among Whites residing in areas of greater socioeconomic disadvantage and in more politically conservative communities.

The findings suggest that the era of lynchings has continued to influence modern-day America. They point to another dimension that may shape public views and debates about crime and punishment. Lynchings, and the culture that they represented, may contribute to ways in which being Black and being criminal get conflated. Not least, they highlight the importance of understanding ways in which community context—the characteristics of the communities in which we all live—may influence how we see the world.

Popular posts from this blog

How do text messages complicate contemporary sexual assault adjudication?

By Heather Hlavka and Sameena Mulla 
Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Marquette University


“There’s no video, no injury. It’s purely one hundred percent ‘he said, she said.’ They had a terrible relationship. They were nasty to each other and they don’t get along well, probably never will. But there is no evidence to support the state’s case, other than their words.” Our article, “’That’s How She Talks’: Animating Text Message Evidence in the Sexual Assault Trial,” begins with these familiar words offered by a defense attorney during a sexual assault trial in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The oft-invoked trope of “he said, she said” in cases of sexual violence suggests that without third-party eye witness testimony or material evidence, sexual assault allegations rest on conflicting reports provided by victims, the accused, and other witnesses. But how do trial attorneys reinvent this trope when the words of the witnesses are preserved as text messages?

Text messages are recorded co…

Submit Your Papers to Law & Society Review!

Rebecca L. Sandefur

 The Law and Society Association and the whole field of law and society research owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Jeannine Bell, Susan Sterett, and Margot Young, for their work as Editors of Law & Society Review.As incoming Editor, I am grateful to them for their stewardship of the journal, their generous support of authors and aspiring authors, and their innovations to the Review, including this blog.
The incoming Editorial Board has begun receiving new manuscripts as they are submitted. Jon Gould, Robert Lawless, Elizabeth Mertz, Jennifer Robbennolt and Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve have generously agreed to serve in this role. Together with participation from the Editorial Advisory Board -- a group deeply appreciated and too numerous to list here -- these scholars’ contributions expand the expertise of the journal’s editorial office across disciplines, methods, theoretical traditions, and regions of the world. Danielle McClellan continues to steady the ship …

TASER Technology and Police Officers’ Understanding and Use of Force

Michael Sierra-Arévalo
Rutgers University-Newark

The TASER--a weapon that uses electric current to incapacitate a subject by causing complete neuromuscular incapacitation--is ubiquitous among U.S. police officers. Spurred by pressure to reduce the lethality of police force, this force technology it is now used by more than 17,000 U.S. law enforcement agencies.

Proponents of TASERs are quick to point out that research shows that most TASER deployments do not result in serious injury or death, and that TASERs provide officers with a useful, less-than-lethal alternative to their firearms. TASER critics, in turn, emphasize that even if TASERs are rarely lethal, 50,000 volts cause excruciating pain, fear, and psychological distress. They further emphasize that the TASER, like any weapon, can still be misused by police officers.

Though a large body of research examines police force, little is known about how officers make their use-of-force decisions in light of this new, less-than-lethal t…