Skip to main content

The Racial Disparity in Police Violence

By: Rory Kramer and Brianna Remster
Villanova University

Accusations of racial bias in police use of force have long been a touchstone for civil unrest in the United States. In the 1960s, cities across the country saw massive protests and violence, including Watts, Detroit, and Philadelphia. In the 1980s, Miami residents rioted after police were acquitted in the death of Arthur McDuffie, presaging the 1992 Los Angeles riots. Police violence also triggered riots in the early 21stcentury in Cincinnati and, most recently, police violence energized a national movement under the #BlackLivesMatter moniker in response to the deaths of young Black victims such as Michael Brown in Ferguson, Freddie Gray in Baltimore, Tamir Rice in Cleveland, and Laquan McDonald in Chicago. Under the competing banner of #BlueLivesMatter, advocates suggest that Black people are more likely to be doing something wrong during police encounters than White people, thus precipitating police use of force. Despite these competing explanations for police violence, no recent systematic research testing these propositions exists.
In our article “Stop, Frisk, and Assault? Racial Disparities in Police Use of Force during Investigatory Stops," we offer a systematic look at race and age inequities in police violence in New York City. New York was amongst the first departments to provide detailed data for every stop-and-frisk performed in the city. At its height, over half a million people a year were stopped by police as part of NYC’s proactive policing strategy. Our study examines over 2 million stops from 2007-2014 of Black and White civilians, observing whether or not those stops include police use of force and more narrowly, whether or not police draw their guns (police are trained to be prepared to use lethal force if they draw their weapon).
Our findings show that police are more likely to use force, including potential lethal force, against Black civilians than Whites, after adjusting for the civilian’s behavior during the encounter, the neighborhood in which the stop occurred, and other characteristics of both the stop and the civilian. In fact, the racial disparity is largest for potential lethal force when police locate evidence of criminal behavior during a stop, when stereotypes of Black persons as criminal and dangerous may be especially powerful. Further, we find that Black youth are more likely to be subjected to police violence than White youth, which resulted in thousands of additional instances of police violence against young Black men per year in New York alone.
We also examined whether stop-and-frisk reforms have affected the racial disparity in experiencing force. New York dramatically reduced its use of investigatory stops, from approximately half a million per year to fewer than 50,000 annually. This was in part because a federal judge declared the NYPD’s execution of stop-and-frisk to be unconstitutional, due to racial disparities in who was stopped. In short, our findings indicate that this reform has had little effect on the racial disparity in police violence—Black civilians remain more likely to experience force than White civilians—but because of the extraordinary decline in stops, thousands fewer New Yorkers, primarily Black, are subjected to police violence annually. Moreover, even with this change, crime has continued to stay low. Hence, policy changes can reduce police violence, but much work remains to be done to reduce the racial disparity in this violence.

Popular posts from this blog

How do text messages complicate contemporary sexual assault adjudication?

By Heather Hlavka and Sameena Mulla 
Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Marquette University

“There’s no video, no injury. It’s purely one hundred percent ‘he said, she said.’ They had a terrible relationship. They were nasty to each other and they don’t get along well, probably never will. But there is no evidence to support the state’s case, other than their words.” Our article, “’That’s How She Talks’: Animating Text Message Evidence in the Sexual Assault Trial,” begins with these familiar words offered by a defense attorney during a sexual assault trial in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The oft-invoked trope of “he said, she said” in cases of sexual violence suggests that without third-party eye witness testimony or material evidence, sexual assault allegations rest on conflicting reports provided by victims, the accused, and other witnesses. But how do trial attorneys reinvent this trope when the words of the witnesses are preserved as text messages?

Text messages are recorded co…

Submit Your Papers to Law & Society Review!

Rebecca L. Sandefur

 The Law and Society Association and the whole field of law and society research owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Jeannine Bell, Susan Sterett, and Margot Young, for their work as Editors of Law & Society Review.As incoming Editor, I am grateful to them for their stewardship of the journal, their generous support of authors and aspiring authors, and their innovations to the Review, including this blog.
The incoming Editorial Board has begun receiving new manuscripts as they are submitted. Jon Gould, Robert Lawless, Elizabeth Mertz, Jennifer Robbennolt and Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve have generously agreed to serve in this role. Together with participation from the Editorial Advisory Board -- a group deeply appreciated and too numerous to list here -- these scholars’ contributions expand the expertise of the journal’s editorial office across disciplines, methods, theoretical traditions, and regions of the world. Danielle McClellan continues to steady the ship …

TASER Technology and Police Officers’ Understanding and Use of Force

Michael Sierra-Arévalo
Rutgers University-Newark

The TASER--a weapon that uses electric current to incapacitate a subject by causing complete neuromuscular incapacitation--is ubiquitous among U.S. police officers. Spurred by pressure to reduce the lethality of police force, this force technology it is now used by more than 17,000 U.S. law enforcement agencies.

Proponents of TASERs are quick to point out that research shows that most TASER deployments do not result in serious injury or death, and that TASERs provide officers with a useful, less-than-lethal alternative to their firearms. TASER critics, in turn, emphasize that even if TASERs are rarely lethal, 50,000 volts cause excruciating pain, fear, and psychological distress. They further emphasize that the TASER, like any weapon, can still be misused by police officers.

Though a large body of research examines police force, little is known about how officers make their use-of-force decisions in light of this new, less-than-lethal t…