Skip to main content

Papers of pioneering feminist attorney Sylvia Roberts now available to researchers at the Newcomb Archives


By: Chloe Raub, Newcomb College Institute of Tulane University



The Newcomb Archives, part of Newcomb College Institute of Tulane University, is thrilled to announce the acquisition of the Sylvia Roberts papers. The collection is now available for research and spans her almost sixty-year legal career, throughout which Roberts dedicated her life to furthering the rights of women and other marginalized groups.


Roberts was born in 1933 in Bryan, TX. She completed an undergraduate degree at UCLA in 1953 and graduated from Tulane Law School in 1956. She was active in founding the National Organization for Women and served as Vice President of NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund, now known as Legal Momentum. She is best known for her successful defense of Lorena Weeks in her case against Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company. Weeks had worked as a Southern Bell telephone operator for many years when she was denied a higher paying position as a company switchman on the basis that the job was only open to men, citing a Georgia state rule that women employees could not be made to lift anything heavier than thirty pounds. She filed a legal appeal but lost in district court. Weeks then began writing all reports by hand, refusing to carry her thirty-four-pound typewriter to her desk in protest, which resulted in her suspension. She brought her case to NOW and Roberts was assigned to represent her before the Fifth Circuit. Roberts won the case on appeal in 1969, arguing the idea that no woman could lift thirty pounds was absurd, given that many women routinely carry children weighing thirty pounds or more. The case marked an important early legal victory for NOW in the fight against gender-based workplace discrimination.

In addition to the Weeks v. Southern Bell records, the collection covers the Sharon Johnson v. University of Pittsburg trial, during which Roberts defended Dr. Johnson in her case against the University for wrongful termination and denial of tenure. Other bodies of records, organized as archival “series,” include the legal defense of those wrongfully committed to hospitals for the criminally insane in Louisiana, domestic violence prevention, and education and early legal practice, among others.

Many of these records suffered pest infestations, humidity and water damage after years in storage in Louisiana’s tropical climate. The Archives staff have worked to preserve them, removing rusting stables, decomposing rubber bands and other debris, placing all documents into acid-free folders and boxes, and inventorying all records in a finding aid that researchers may use as a guide to the collection. The finding aid is searchable in Tulane’s online database.

The Archives also worked to develop ethical use guidelines for the collection. Because the practice of law in the United States is not limited to analyses of the decisions of the courts, and because the work of lawyers is present in nearly all aspects of American life, the Newcomb Archives believes the personal and professional papers of lawyers are vital to a holistic understanding of American history (see Covitz, 2001). However, some of these records contain sensitive information and require careful attention to their use. Should a researcher wish to publish any information where a client is identifiable, they must obtain permission from the client, or, if the client is deceased, a legal representative of the client. Out of respect for the confidentiality privileges of those advised by Roberts in her capacity as their attorney, personal identifiers have been redacted from the online finding aid for all cases for which the last inclusive date of legal materials is less than fifty years from present.

Newcomb College Institute is honored to be the custodian of these important papers, which form a cornerstone among our collections documenting the history of women and gender in the Gulf South. Sylvia Roberts’s unwavering commitment to equal rights and social justice is evident in her papers, and the Newcomb Archives is excited to make her life’s work available to researchers.

Images:
Sylvia Roberts, Johnson v. University of Pittsburg Courtroom Sketch, Sylvia Roberts papers, Newcomb Archives collection NA-282

Lorena Weeks with typewriter, Sylvia Roberts papers, Newcomb Archives collection NA-28

Sylvia Roberts and founding members of National Organization for Women, Sylvia Roberts papers, Newcomb Archives collection NA-282

Popular posts from this blog

How do text messages complicate contemporary sexual assault adjudication?

By Heather Hlavka and Sameena Mulla 
Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Marquette University


“There’s no video, no injury. It’s purely one hundred percent ‘he said, she said.’ They had a terrible relationship. They were nasty to each other and they don’t get along well, probably never will. But there is no evidence to support the state’s case, other than their words.” Our article, “’That’s How She Talks’: Animating Text Message Evidence in the Sexual Assault Trial,” begins with these familiar words offered by a defense attorney during a sexual assault trial in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The oft-invoked trope of “he said, she said” in cases of sexual violence suggests that without third-party eye witness testimony or material evidence, sexual assault allegations rest on conflicting reports provided by victims, the accused, and other witnesses. But how do trial attorneys reinvent this trope when the words of the witnesses are preserved as text messages?

Text messages are recorded co…

Submit Your Papers to Law & Society Review!

Rebecca L. Sandefur

 The Law and Society Association and the whole field of law and society research owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Jeannine Bell, Susan Sterett, and Margot Young, for their work as Editors of Law & Society Review.As incoming Editor, I am grateful to them for their stewardship of the journal, their generous support of authors and aspiring authors, and their innovations to the Review, including this blog.
The incoming Editorial Board has begun receiving new manuscripts as they are submitted. Jon Gould, Robert Lawless, Elizabeth Mertz, Jennifer Robbennolt and Nicole Gonzalez Van Cleve have generously agreed to serve in this role. Together with participation from the Editorial Advisory Board -- a group deeply appreciated and too numerous to list here -- these scholars’ contributions expand the expertise of the journal’s editorial office across disciplines, methods, theoretical traditions, and regions of the world. Danielle McClellan continues to steady the ship …

TASER Technology and Police Officers’ Understanding and Use of Force

Michael Sierra-Arévalo
Rutgers University-Newark

The TASER--a weapon that uses electric current to incapacitate a subject by causing complete neuromuscular incapacitation--is ubiquitous among U.S. police officers. Spurred by pressure to reduce the lethality of police force, this force technology it is now used by more than 17,000 U.S. law enforcement agencies.

Proponents of TASERs are quick to point out that research shows that most TASER deployments do not result in serious injury or death, and that TASERs provide officers with a useful, less-than-lethal alternative to their firearms. TASER critics, in turn, emphasize that even if TASERs are rarely lethal, 50,000 volts cause excruciating pain, fear, and psychological distress. They further emphasize that the TASER, like any weapon, can still be misused by police officers.

Though a large body of research examines police force, little is known about how officers make their use-of-force decisions in light of this new, less-than-lethal t…