Skip to main content

The Roots of Life Without Parole Sentencing


By Christopher Seeds, New York University




Since the early 1970s, life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (LWOP)—an extreme prison sentence offering no reasonable possibility of release—has emerged as a routine legal sanction and penal practice in the United States. A century, even several decades ago, this would have been unexpected. Yet today, with more than 50,000 prisoners so sentenced and hundreds of laws authorizing it, LWOP is firmly entrenched in American penal policy, in judicial and prosecutorial decisionmaking, and in public discourse. Two general theses—one depicting LWOP as a replacement penalty for capital crimes; another linking LWOP with tough-on-crime sentencing policy of the mass incarceration era—have served as working explanations for this phenomenon. In the absence of in-depth studies, however, there has been little evidence with which to carefully evaluate these narratives.

My article, “Disaggregating LWOP: Life Without Parole, Capital Punishment, and Mass Incarceration in Florida, 1972-1995,” provides a state-level historical account of the specific conditions and processes by which LWOP emerged in Florida, the state that currently holds the most LWOP prisoners. Drawing on archival documents and audio recordings as well as a broad range of complementary sources, I find that while anti-death-penalty movements and punitive politics certainly play a part, neither of the conventional narratives captures the complexity or principal motivating forces behind the rise of LWOP. More than an expected feature of tough-on-crime politics or an unintended consequence of humanitarian efforts to replace the death penalty with something less severe, in Florida from the 1970s into the 1990s, LWOP is best characterized as an artifact of transition. LWOP emerged as state actors dealt with two large-scale transformations in the penal field—(1) the constitutional regulation of capital punishment and (2) the transition away from indeterminate sentencing—through local penal structures and politics. Among the most substantial changes to law and practice was a sentencing guidelines reform that prioritized fairness and efficiency, not severity or incapacitation.

Showing how LWOP arose from reforms without punitive purposes, and in complicated ways that were not necessarily planned, the study provokes refection on very severe punishments and the processes that produce them. It also provides an addendum to the usual narrative in which mass incarceration results from laws and policies intended to be tough on crime. In addition, the case of LWOP in Florida offers a pointed reminder that the USA’s history with indeterminate sentencing is important for explaining the extreme incarceration growth that followed, suggesting a need for continued attention to shifts away from indeterminate sentencing as factors responsible for the shape and variety of contemporary American penal policy.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment: Making valid claims in social science research: A comment on Jenness and Calavita

By Tom Tyler, Yale Law School

I am writing to comment on several methodological issues raised by the article by Valerie Jenness and Kitty Calavita, entitled “It depends on the outcome”: Prisoners, grievances, and perceptions of justice”. I am pleased that the methodology blog for Law and Society Review has been created and provides a forum to discuss research design issues. I will address three aspects of the study: operationalization of the variables; statistical analysis; and inclusiveness of the literature review.

The Jenness/Calavita paper studies California prisons using data collected through interviews with prisoners. The paper says that it tests the perceptual procedural justice model, in particular there are frequent references to the Tyler model, in a prison setting. The study concludes that “prisoners privilege the actual outcome of disputes as their barometer of justice” showing “the dominance of substantive outcomes” (from the abstract)”.

I agree with Jenness and Cala…

Europeanization or National Specificity? Legal Approaches to Sexual Harassment in France, 2002–2012

By Abigail Saguy, UCLA

Sexual harassment represents a massive problem for working women worldwide. A recent social media campaign has brought increased awareness to this fact. In late 2017—after three-dozen women accused Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment, assault, or rape—millions of women posted “Me Too” on Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook, and other social media platforms. Taking inspiration from African American activist Tarana Burke—who, in 2007, started an offline “Me Too” campaign to let sex abuse survivors know that they were not alone—actress Alyssa Milano launched this online Me Too campaign to shift the focus from Weinstein to victims. She hoped this would “give people a sense of the magnitude of the problem.”[1] While some posted simply, “Me Too,” others provided wrenching detail about abuse they had sometimes never before shared publicly. In France, a similar social media campaign flourished, under the hashtag “balance ton porc,” loosely translated as “sq…