Skip to main content

Ten Insights Regarding Sexual Harassment



By Loan LePresident of the Institute for Good Government and Inclusion

The #MeToo explosion has demonstrated how common sexual harassment is and how quiet the settlements are, or how much people have not complained. It’s long been named as illegal sex discrimination in the United States,as a result of feminist movements. Sociolegal scholars explain what happens to complaints on the ground, an exercise of political power if ever there was one. Amy Blackstone, Christopher Uggen and Heather McLaughlin argued in Law and Society Review, assailants often choose women who are least likely to complain. As Anna Maria Marshall and Abigail Saguy have argued, people and workplace organizations explain problems in ways that limit their meaning as unequal working conditions, or sexual assault. The news in the United States has taken over other ways of explaining women’s disadvantages at work, including in the academy. We have yet to see systematic discussion of problems in the academy. Here, Loan Le, President of the Institute of Good Government and Inclusion, takes up the invitation in the New West blog to reflect on how sexual harassment, stalking, and assault likely affects gender representation in the academy. Here, she presents ten early insights from an ongoing study.


Longstanding institutional failures contribute to the notable under-representation of women in the field of Political Science and on college and university campuses more broadly. Explanatory factors may vary but the sexual harassment of students, failures in investigation despite Title IX and Title VII protections and retaliation should feature prominently in understanding gender disparities across United States Universities.

Sexual misconduct in the academy is pervasive. Results from the 2015 Survey by the Association of American Universities highlighted that a high proportion, 69% of female graduate students, reported sexual harassment on campus and further, over 22% identified their sexual harasser as a faculty member. More recently, Karen Kelsky, a professional consultant and advisor to members of the academy at different stages in their careers, received over 1600 stories after of sexual misconduct from current or former members of the academy just twelve days after posting a survey on her site.

What impact does this pervasive sexual harassment have?

One mechanism for under-representation of women in science is the interaction of power asymmetries between advisor and student. Benson and Thomson (1982: 247) report, "frequently the case with graduate training that a single faculty member has as much influence over a student's career prospects as an employer does over an employee's. In such contexts, one readily imagines, the coercive effects of sexual intrusion can be consequential.” Cortina, Swan and Fitzgerald (1998: 431) found that women who experienced little to no sexual harassment were more likely to report that they would still choose to attend their university "than those had endured moderate or high rates of harassment.” These issues are old, and some would argue we have made progress; nevertheless, we still have a long way to go before women achieve equality at our institutions of higher education.

We need to do a better job of obtaining systematic insights into patterns and practices of discrimination. One complicating factor is that the acquisition of recent, detailed, and systematic data with rigorous sampling for appropriate statistical analysis at the national level is a challenging task. Nevertheless, since sexual misconduct has been widely reported in the media, some public data are readily available for analysis. The Institute for Good Government and Inclusion (IGGI a non-partisan 501(c)(3) public policy think tank) obtained data on 113 cases of alleged sexual misconduct at the University of California, referred to in an article titled, “Sexual harassment: records show how University of California faculty target students." We are currently evaluating this dataset but we expect that the results of this analysis will aid not only the University of California but also other colleges and universities as they continue to develop best practices for combating violence against women.

As a start, here are ten lessons drawn from the investigation files for one faculty member accused of sexual harassment at UC Berkeley, astronomer Geoff Marcy. Note that many of these points were previously delivered in October of 2017, when IGGI’s Dr. Le delivered a talk about “Sexual Harassment and its Effect on Women in the Academy” at an NSF-funded workshop (1643084) “Professional Advancement Through Narrative” in Washington DC.

Ten Insights Regarding Sexual Harassment:

1
Fear of retaliation is real.
The literature states that graduate students are particularly vulnerable, with many students stating that they were unwilling to report the harasser for sexual misconduct because they thought the accused could influence their careers
2
Respondent (or accused) often claimed that the complainant was willing.
Power differences made students feel like they had to go along until they couldn't take it anymore, so harassment stretches over time.
3
Victims report a fear of not being believed
Students were unwilling to make protected disclosures until they found out that others were also reporting, so it is important to encourage victims to report.
4
We should rely on more than numbers to understand affected subgroups.
It is easier for faculty members to access graduate students than undergrads, but the sheer number of undergraduates mean there are more of these complaints about predators.
5
Sexual harassment affects the learning environment of the student.
Marcy was reported by a third party (graduate student) for touching the bare shoulder of an undergraduate and taking a photo of her with a lollipop in her mouth. To this third party, the victim appeared to have lost interest in the class after the harassment. 
6
We need training to encourage reporting by observers.
Third party or witness reporting of sexual harassment is important. We need to encourage whistleblowing to identify significant cases that might go otherwise unreported.
7
Harassment may not be apparent on surface.
Student often must negotiate ongoing interactions with the accused on campus.
8
We may not know what comprises sexual harassment well enough, so we need better training on examples of sexual harassment in real life.
“I thought that it was only me.” “I was unsure of whether I had done something wrong. And so the fact that I later learned that it was a pattern of behavior meant I was able to contextualize what happened," reported one victim.
9
Training with actual examples of how to report misconduct is important.
We may not know our rights (applied) or how to report sexual harassment, so training should include this.
10
We need more a priori training on evidence to collect for victims of sexual misconduct.
Victims are the ones on the scene and may delay reporting for various reasons. Contrary to the narrative that we are punishing many innocent respondents, the burden for a preponderance of evidence is often hard to meet. 



We will provide ongoing study updates at IGGI's website (link to thinkiggi.com).

This post is also available at New West as part of an initiative by the WPSA's Committee on the Status of Women to encourage reflections on the profession.

Popular posts from this blog

On writing

By Susan Sterett
Law & Society Review Co-Editor

One thing I know for sure after having co-edited Law and Society Review for almost three years is that just about every college and university would like more publications from faculty members. Many colleges and universities around the world want people to write for peer-reviewed journals, so like other journals, Law and Society Review has been getting an increasing number of submissions. Some journals have big backlogs. Some journals have stopped accepting submissions. Everyone is overwhelmed with content. How can you prepare your paper for LSR? This post will point to a few resources that could help, based in my experience from editing, conversations with other editors, and my conversations at the wonderful 2017 sociolegal studies early career workshop at the University of Cape Town. All have made me rethink how I submit to journals.

A few thoughts, most of which are readily found on the internet. Even so, many people may no…

Law & Society Review is pleased to announce two opportunities for scholars who are from or who write about the Global South. Both opportunities have early January deadlines.

The first opportunity is the Sociolegal Studies Early Career Writing Workshop, March 21-23, 2019, at the University of Cape Town. This intensive workshop, co-sponsored by Law & Society Review, is for a small group of early career scholars from any university in Africa to receive feedback on papers in progress and mentoring on writing/publishing processes. The goal is to help one another toward writing goals and publication. The Workshop will cover travel expenses and accommodation. Applications (including draft paper and letter of reference) are due January 14, 2019. For details, please visit the Early Career Workshop website here. For additional questions, contact pbl-cls@uct.ac.za.

Another opportunity is the Law and Society in Africa conference, April 1-3, 2019, organized by American University Cairo's Law & Society Research Unit. The first Law and Society in Africa Conference, held in South Africa in 2016, was a great success, with more than 100 attendees…

How do text messages complicate contemporary sexual assault adjudication?

By Heather Hlavka and Sameena Mulla 
Department of Social and Cultural Sciences, Marquette University


“There’s no video, no injury. It’s purely one hundred percent ‘he said, she said.’ They had a terrible relationship. They were nasty to each other and they don’t get along well, probably never will. But there is no evidence to support the state’s case, other than their words.” Our article, “’That’s How She Talks’: Animating Text Message Evidence in the Sexual Assault Trial,” begins with these familiar words offered by a defense attorney during a sexual assault trial in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The oft-invoked trope of “he said, she said” in cases of sexual violence suggests that without third-party eye witness testimony or material evidence, sexual assault allegations rest on conflicting reports provided by victims, the accused, and other witnesses. But how do trial attorneys reinvent this trope when the words of the witnesses are preserved as text messages?

Text messages are recorded co…