Skip to main content

Ten Insights Regarding Sexual Harassment



By Loan LePresident of the Institute for Good Government and Inclusion

The #MeToo explosion has demonstrated how common sexual harassment is and how quiet the settlements are, or how much people have not complained. It’s long been named as illegal sex discrimination in the United States,as a result of feminist movements. Sociolegal scholars explain what happens to complaints on the ground, an exercise of political power if ever there was one. Amy Blackstone, Christopher Uggen and Heather McLaughlin argued in Law and Society Review, assailants often choose women who are least likely to complain. As Anna Maria Marshall and Abigail Saguy have argued, people and workplace organizations explain problems in ways that limit their meaning as unequal working conditions, or sexual assault. The news in the United States has taken over other ways of explaining women’s disadvantages at work, including in the academy. We have yet to see systematic discussion of problems in the academy. Here, Loan Le, President of the Institute of Good Government and Inclusion, takes up the invitation in the New West blog to reflect on how sexual harassment, stalking, and assault likely affects gender representation in the academy. Here, she presents ten early insights from an ongoing study.


Longstanding institutional failures contribute to the notable under-representation of women in the field of Political Science and on college and university campuses more broadly. Explanatory factors may vary but the sexual harassment of students, failures in investigation despite Title IX and Title VII protections and retaliation should feature prominently in understanding gender disparities across United States Universities.

Sexual misconduct in the academy is pervasive. Results from the 2015 Survey by the Association of American Universities highlighted that a high proportion, 69% of female graduate students, reported sexual harassment on campus and further, over 22% identified their sexual harasser as a faculty member. More recently, Karen Kelsky, a professional consultant and advisor to members of the academy at different stages in their careers, received over 1600 stories after of sexual misconduct from current or former members of the academy just twelve days after posting a survey on her site.

What impact does this pervasive sexual harassment have?

One mechanism for under-representation of women in science is the interaction of power asymmetries between advisor and student. Benson and Thomson (1982: 247) report, "frequently the case with graduate training that a single faculty member has as much influence over a student's career prospects as an employer does over an employee's. In such contexts, one readily imagines, the coercive effects of sexual intrusion can be consequential.” Cortina, Swan and Fitzgerald (1998: 431) found that women who experienced little to no sexual harassment were more likely to report that they would still choose to attend their university "than those had endured moderate or high rates of harassment.” These issues are old, and some would argue we have made progress; nevertheless, we still have a long way to go before women achieve equality at our institutions of higher education.

We need to do a better job of obtaining systematic insights into patterns and practices of discrimination. One complicating factor is that the acquisition of recent, detailed, and systematic data with rigorous sampling for appropriate statistical analysis at the national level is a challenging task. Nevertheless, since sexual misconduct has been widely reported in the media, some public data are readily available for analysis. The Institute for Good Government and Inclusion (IGGI a non-partisan 501(c)(3) public policy think tank) obtained data on 113 cases of alleged sexual misconduct at the University of California, referred to in an article titled, “Sexual harassment: records show how University of California faculty target students." We are currently evaluating this dataset but we expect that the results of this analysis will aid not only the University of California but also other colleges and universities as they continue to develop best practices for combating violence against women.

As a start, here are ten lessons drawn from the investigation files for one faculty member accused of sexual harassment at UC Berkeley, astronomer Geoff Marcy. Note that many of these points were previously delivered in October of 2017, when IGGI’s Dr. Le delivered a talk about “Sexual Harassment and its Effect on Women in the Academy” at an NSF-funded workshop (1643084) “Professional Advancement Through Narrative” in Washington DC.

Ten Insights Regarding Sexual Harassment:

1
Fear of retaliation is real.
The literature states that graduate students are particularly vulnerable, with many students stating that they were unwilling to report the harasser for sexual misconduct because they thought the accused could influence their careers
2
Respondent (or accused) often claimed that the complainant was willing.
Power differences made students feel like they had to go along until they couldn't take it anymore, so harassment stretches over time.
3
Victims report a fear of not being believed
Students were unwilling to make protected disclosures until they found out that others were also reporting, so it is important to encourage victims to report.
4
We should rely on more than numbers to understand affected subgroups.
It is easier for faculty members to access graduate students than undergrads, but the sheer number of undergraduates mean there are more of these complaints about predators.
5
Sexual harassment affects the learning environment of the student.
Marcy was reported by a third party (graduate student) for touching the bare shoulder of an undergraduate and taking a photo of her with a lollipop in her mouth. To this third party, the victim appeared to have lost interest in the class after the harassment. 
6
We need training to encourage reporting by observers.
Third party or witness reporting of sexual harassment is important. We need to encourage whistleblowing to identify significant cases that might go otherwise unreported.
7
Harassment may not be apparent on surface.
Student often must negotiate ongoing interactions with the accused on campus.
8
We may not know what comprises sexual harassment well enough, so we need better training on examples of sexual harassment in real life.
“I thought that it was only me.” “I was unsure of whether I had done something wrong. And so the fact that I later learned that it was a pattern of behavior meant I was able to contextualize what happened," reported one victim.
9
Training with actual examples of how to report misconduct is important.
We may not know our rights (applied) or how to report sexual harassment, so training should include this.
10
We need more a priori training on evidence to collect for victims of sexual misconduct.
Victims are the ones on the scene and may delay reporting for various reasons. Contrary to the narrative that we are punishing many innocent respondents, the burden for a preponderance of evidence is often hard to meet. 



We will provide ongoing study updates at IGGI's website (link to thinkiggi.com).

This post is also available at New West as part of an initiative by the WPSA's Committee on the Status of Women to encourage reflections on the profession.

Popular posts from this blog

Europeanization or National Specificity? Legal Approaches to Sexual Harassment in France, 2002–2012

By Abigail Saguy, UCLA

Sexual harassment represents a massive problem for working women worldwide. A recent social media campaign has brought increased awareness to this fact. In late 2017—after three-dozen women accused Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment, assault, or rape—millions of women posted “Me Too” on Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook, and other social media platforms. Taking inspiration from African American activist Tarana Burke—who, in 2007, started an offline “Me Too” campaign to let sex abuse survivors know that they were not alone—actress Alyssa Milano launched this online Me Too campaign to shift the focus from Weinstein to victims. She hoped this would “give people a sense of the magnitude of the problem.”[1] While some posted simply, “Me Too,” others provided wrenching detail about abuse they had sometimes never before shared publicly. In France, a similar social media campaign flourished, under the hashtag “balance ton porc,” loosely translated as “sq…

Comment: Making valid claims in social science research: A comment on Jenness and Calavita

By Tom Tyler, Yale Law School

I am writing to comment on several methodological issues raised by the article by Valerie Jenness and Kitty Calavita, entitled “It depends on the outcome”: Prisoners, grievances, and perceptions of justice”. I am pleased that the methodology blog for Law and Society Review has been created and provides a forum to discuss research design issues. I will address three aspects of the study: operationalization of the variables; statistical analysis; and inclusiveness of the literature review.

The Jenness/Calavita paper studies California prisons using data collected through interviews with prisoners. The paper says that it tests the perceptual procedural justice model, in particular there are frequent references to the Tyler model, in a prison setting. The study concludes that “prisoners privilege the actual outcome of disputes as their barometer of justice” showing “the dominance of substantive outcomes” (from the abstract)”.

I agree with Jenness and Cala…

Boiling in the Cells: Prisoners, Grievances, and Substantive Justice

By Valerie Jennessand Kitty Calavita University of California, Irvine Department of Criminology, Law and Society