Skip to main content

#istandwithCEU


Dr. Susan Sterett
Virginia Tech 



The Hungarian legislature has just enacted legislation that will shut down Central European University in Budapest, a unique private American/ Hungarian university in Budapest dedicated to teaching and research in the humanities and social sciences.  The university is accredited in the United States and in Europe. The Law and Society Association has joined other professional associations in writing letters to the ambassador and the Minister of Education recognizing the threat the legislation poses to the free circulation of ideas.  The Law and Society Association met in Budapest in 2001 and, and faculty, staff and students at CEU warmly greeted us.  Since then, we have continued connections with colleagues in Hungary through CRNs.

People have poured into the streets to protest the legislation.  Thanks to Twitter, you can see photos at #istandwithCEU.  Streets we hurried through in 2001 on the way to panels or cafes, or stopped in to buy an ice cream, have filled with people, testifying to the value of learning from each other across national boundaries.

Universities’ commitments to learning as transnational make them particularly visible sites for policing boundaries. Universities’ and colleges’ letters and lawsuits objecting to the executive order banning people from six countries from entering the United States stated how central learning.  The threat to CEU is not only a threat to one university, but one of threats to the value of a shared commitment to critical curiosity about how we understand our world.  In the anxious world of higher education in the United States, we have taken to justifying higher education as valuable for individuals’ jobs.  Lost in those conversations is a belief that the stories we tell, including in popular culture—most recently in the United States, The Zookeeper’s Wife, Get Out, Moonlight, Hidden Figures, Loving—are intertwined with what we know in history,  about mass incarceration, and about legal structures of inequality, brought to life with imagination and narrative skill. 




Legal ideas have long traveled, and the Law and Society Association’s work developing international connections, including at CEU, have invited us to become more aware of how critical race theory,  courts, human rights, constitutionalism, and transnational trade governance work at multiple sites. National states have borrowed legal structures from each other, or chosen not to borrow, based on representations of what other countries do.  Without learning from people different from us, in places different from ours, we impoverish our world.

Popular posts from this blog

Comment: Making valid claims in social science research: A comment on Jenness and Calavita

By Tom Tyler, Yale Law School

I am writing to comment on several methodological issues raised by the article by Valerie Jenness and Kitty Calavita, entitled “It depends on the outcome”: Prisoners, grievances, and perceptions of justice”. I am pleased that the methodology blog for Law and Society Review has been created and provides a forum to discuss research design issues. I will address three aspects of the study: operationalization of the variables; statistical analysis; and inclusiveness of the literature review.

The Jenness/Calavita paper studies California prisons using data collected through interviews with prisoners. The paper says that it tests the perceptual procedural justice model, in particular there are frequent references to the Tyler model, in a prison setting. The study concludes that “prisoners privilege the actual outcome of disputes as their barometer of justice” showing “the dominance of substantive outcomes” (from the abstract)”.

I agree with Jenness and Cala…

The Roots of Life Without Parole Sentencing

By Christopher Seeds, New York University



Since the early 1970s, life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (LWOP)—an extreme prison sentence offering no reasonable possibility of release—has emerged as a routine legal sanction and penal practice in the United States. A century, even several decades ago, this would have been unexpected. Yet today, with more than 50,000 prisoners so sentenced and hundreds of laws authorizing it, LWOP is firmly entrenched in American penal policy, in judicial and prosecutorial decisionmaking, and in public discourse. Two general theses—one depicting LWOP as a replacement penalty for capital crimes; another linking LWOP with tough-on-crime sentencing policy of the mass incarceration era—have served as working explanations for this phenomenon. In the absence of in-depth studies, however, there has been little evidence with which to carefully evaluate these narratives.

My article, “Disaggregating LWOP: Life Without Parole, Capital Punishment, and …

Europeanization or National Specificity? Legal Approaches to Sexual Harassment in France, 2002–2012

By Abigail Saguy, UCLA

Sexual harassment represents a massive problem for working women worldwide. A recent social media campaign has brought increased awareness to this fact. In late 2017—after three-dozen women accused Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment, assault, or rape—millions of women posted “Me Too” on Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook, and other social media platforms. Taking inspiration from African American activist Tarana Burke—who, in 2007, started an offline “Me Too” campaign to let sex abuse survivors know that they were not alone—actress Alyssa Milano launched this online Me Too campaign to shift the focus from Weinstein to victims. She hoped this would “give people a sense of the magnitude of the problem.”[1] While some posted simply, “Me Too,” others provided wrenching detail about abuse they had sometimes never before shared publicly. In France, a similar social media campaign flourished, under the hashtag “balance ton porc,” loosely translated as “sq…